Scottand1000
New User
Actually, I have 2 questions, both related to the stabilized Rx's. I think the 1st question is easy to answer, the 2nd maybe not. Here goes... (OpenTX-X9D-2019 2.3.15, Archer-X_2.1.10)
1) When an OpenTX model file that controls a FrSky stabilized Rx is saved to the PC, are the various stabilization parameters backed up also? Or, are they only stored in the Rx? Maybe the better question to ask: is there a way to back up the stabilization parameters (i.e. surface direction, gains, etc.) ???
2) I've been using the FrSky stabilized Rx's for 3-4 years now. Both the ACCST version (SxR) and the Access version (SRx). I think they are great. I have them in a half dozen planes. I thought I knew all about them, how to set them up, etc. Never really had any trouble with them. But I ran into something today which tells me I don't understand some things about how they handle end points.
I have a new plane set up with a SR8. Prob 30 flights on it so far. As part of the tweaking process to try to make it groove a bit better, I fiddled with the end point settings on one of the ailerons last night. When I got to the field this morning, I did a cursory check of the control surfaces before flying, just to double check before going up. Long story short, when I toggled between low, med, and high rates with the aileron stick fully deflected, first in one direction, then the other, I found I had lost the additional movement between med and high on just the RH aileron, and in just the upward deflection direction. Weird. I suspected the Rx had lost end point calibration.
This afternoon, I tried to debug. I found that I needed to initiate a self check to get full deflection back, even after the tiniest of an end point change on my model setup. An end point change of say 5% caused the Rx to lose the full range of the travel on that surface. And it lost a significant amount of travel, way more than the tiny end point tweak was in the first place (in this case, 5%). Further, I found if I wanted to increase the travel on an aileron in one direction, I can't seem to do it real time; the aileron doesn't move even though I have the TX and Rx on, and I'm increasing the end point amount in the OUTPUTS screen. I found the only way to do this is to guess how far I wanted to increase the travel (say 5%), then run a self check, then go back and see just how much further the aileron actually moves. If 5% wasn't enough, repeat the process and increase it some more... It's like a trial and error process.
I don't remember having troubles like this on past model setups using the FSky stabilized Rx's. Maybe I just never tweaked the end points after the initial setup... IDK. But it makes me wonder, just how does one adjust the end points without having to do a self check just to see how far the travel has changed? It's almost like I want to put a non-stabilized Rx in the plane, just on the bench, to get the endpoints tweaked to where I want them, then reinstall the stabilized Rx and do one self check and be done with it.
Can anyone shed some light on this? It seems like I'm missing something or not fully understanding how end points are set in the model vs end points learned by the stabilized Rx.
Thanks, Scott
1) When an OpenTX model file that controls a FrSky stabilized Rx is saved to the PC, are the various stabilization parameters backed up also? Or, are they only stored in the Rx? Maybe the better question to ask: is there a way to back up the stabilization parameters (i.e. surface direction, gains, etc.) ???
2) I've been using the FrSky stabilized Rx's for 3-4 years now. Both the ACCST version (SxR) and the Access version (SRx). I think they are great. I have them in a half dozen planes. I thought I knew all about them, how to set them up, etc. Never really had any trouble with them. But I ran into something today which tells me I don't understand some things about how they handle end points.
I have a new plane set up with a SR8. Prob 30 flights on it so far. As part of the tweaking process to try to make it groove a bit better, I fiddled with the end point settings on one of the ailerons last night. When I got to the field this morning, I did a cursory check of the control surfaces before flying, just to double check before going up. Long story short, when I toggled between low, med, and high rates with the aileron stick fully deflected, first in one direction, then the other, I found I had lost the additional movement between med and high on just the RH aileron, and in just the upward deflection direction. Weird. I suspected the Rx had lost end point calibration.
This afternoon, I tried to debug. I found that I needed to initiate a self check to get full deflection back, even after the tiniest of an end point change on my model setup. An end point change of say 5% caused the Rx to lose the full range of the travel on that surface. And it lost a significant amount of travel, way more than the tiny end point tweak was in the first place (in this case, 5%). Further, I found if I wanted to increase the travel on an aileron in one direction, I can't seem to do it real time; the aileron doesn't move even though I have the TX and Rx on, and I'm increasing the end point amount in the OUTPUTS screen. I found the only way to do this is to guess how far I wanted to increase the travel (say 5%), then run a self check, then go back and see just how much further the aileron actually moves. If 5% wasn't enough, repeat the process and increase it some more... It's like a trial and error process.
I don't remember having troubles like this on past model setups using the FSky stabilized Rx's. Maybe I just never tweaked the end points after the initial setup... IDK. But it makes me wonder, just how does one adjust the end points without having to do a self check just to see how far the travel has changed? It's almost like I want to put a non-stabilized Rx in the plane, just on the bench, to get the endpoints tweaked to where I want them, then reinstall the stabilized Rx and do one self check and be done with it.
Can anyone shed some light on this? It seems like I'm missing something or not fully understanding how end points are set in the model vs end points learned by the stabilized Rx.
Thanks, Scott