Dunno about the colors yet. When I redrew the plans I gave it a smallish, elongated bubble canopy that implying an apparent scale size similar to a B-57 or a B-47. I was thinking some scale-like USAF SAC or NASA test flight markings. Bare metal would be neat, but I’m wondering about visibility. Or I could just go with sporty colors. I still have lots of time before I have to decide!I'm digging this build, such a unique design. What colors will it end up?
I believe I read on either the Barcs forum that he passed in Dec of ‘23.Is Chas Gardiner still around, Mucky?
I lost contact with him.
Cheers,
Doc.
The epoxy/Cabosil fillet (bead) needs to be done first because the fillet is on the interior corner of the glass. Other than that, it doesn’t matter which order you glass the top, bottom and subTE surfaces.So do you run the bead of epoxy/cabosil on both the top and bottom of the sub TE? (You are glassing both the top and bottom of the wing, correct?)
what is the order of the layup, wing top and bottom, then sub TE, and finally the epoxy/cabosil treatment?
Thanks - but sorry to hear that.I believe I read on either the Barcs forum that he passed in Dec of ‘23.
Really nice tidy build Mucky - Chas, would have been happy.Unfortunately yes, but a fitting tribute to Chas (and many others) that their designs are still being built and flown.
Started glassing. Decided to go with 1.5 oz/yrd^2 cloth for a little more surface durability.
View attachment 21723View attachment 21724
I clamp wood clothes pins to the edge of the overhanging excess cloth along the LE and tip and then either lean them inwards or push them under the LE with a block to ensure a small overlap with the cloth from the other side.
View attachment 21725
Incidentally, I discovered if you tape one end of a single edge razor blade and leave some extra tape overhang the end, the overhanging tape makes a nice “grip tab” so you can wield the blade close and shallow to any surface without your finger tips getting in the way. I find it allows for a lighter touch and more delicate control.
View attachment 21726View attachment 21727
Back in the mid 80’s two buddies and I regularly flew the 36” built up ones from the pull out plans. I think I built 3 of them back in the day. We found them to be well behaved. Interestingly, with the CG and trim dialed in, the model could be flown inverted or right side up with no trim changes.Really nice tidy build Mucky - Chas, would have been happy.
Have you ever flown one?
Not sure about the double size, but the smaller giveaway plan version was a real handful and great fun to fly - especially if you got the CG a tiny bit wrong.
Are you going to leave it a wood finish?
Really nice.
Doc.
Hey Mucker,Back in the mid 80’s two buddies and I regularly flew the 36” built up ones from the pull out plans. I think I built 3 of them back in the day. We found them to be well behaved. Interestingly, with the CG and trim dialed in, the model could be flown inverted or right side up with no trim changes.
As far as I know, he only published the 36” one but a fellow named Pete Burnett published the “Masterix”, which was a development of the Obelix with a few design differences and span of 48”. Both plans are on Outerzone.
This 55” is my own upscaling of the original 36”. It will be painted. There’s a big ugly scar on the top left panel.
So I’m in the USA - we don’t have L plate stickers here, but some learners will put a note or sticker on the back to ward off road ragers.Hey Mucker,
yes, we found much the same on the inverted flying side. The biggest problem I remember was figuring out which way up the damn thing was at times. I put two higher fins on my second plane to help with that, which it did a bit. I put two "L" plate learner driver stickers on the bottom too - do you still have "L" plates in the UK?
The inverted performance was always surprising, but if you asked Chas why he would just tap the side of his nose and say "It was designed that way" He was a real character. I don't think he knew why actually.
Looking at it now with a bit more experience I think in flight the center and outer wing sections are quite well separated by those "wing fence" fins on the upper surfaces and the bulbous nose will drive the isobars to each side. That would have had quite an effect on the pressure and spanwise flow profile.
Is there a wing section given on the drawing or is it one of the traditional RCM&E "Size Ten" sole of the shoe sections? As I remember Chas told me it was a "reflex" section that he'd dreamed up with some ancestry from another earlier model. I made one with an E180 section which was a lot thinner and so faster but with little inverted performance. Killer rolls though.
I think the Obelix might have been among the most built of the RCM&E giveaway plans.
Great fun for me right now as I'm making forays back into balsa right now with AWD.
Cheers,
Doc.