LOL,Quote: I too have had issues with Aeroic nomanclature, I think we all do.
Thats because The King's English is not your native language, Konrad. You speak 'Mercan.
But me?...hot damn, I not only do speak the Kings English, but I'm also phenomenally gifted at spelling and grammar, and my diction is...well Byronic...and if you believe that, well...
I like nomanclature a lot - is it similar to nomansland, or possibly an ancient term for an unmarried male?
You never cease to amaze me...
Doc.
@Doc J nice manual. I'd like to ask that in the next revision that my name be removed. The information (photos) are fine I just don't want my name associated with Aeroic, especially since I wasn't paid, or even asked about their use.Noooo....anything but that...why not call if "Fluffy"
Crikey I'll have to really write the instructions now...
And...as if by Magic...I did.
Doc...
I'm getting great service from the use of 8mm thick servos in my real Schwing Corsa 108 (2.7m) and F3F (3m) racers. I'm partial to the KST HS08a servo as the gears really are a class above the other 8mm servos.JJ, might I suggest you start at 98mm, it won’t bite you at all at that CG.
I bought mine on September 1st 2020, and it was maidened, I think, the second week of November. I’m pretty sure mine was the first Forza flown in the UK, it was definitely the first sold by T9. One thing I did when fitting it out was to use a normal 10mm thick servo for the ailerons (with blistered covers) rather than the recommended 8mm, as I always have doubts about gear strength of tiny servos used on primary control surfaces at very high speed.
The wing servos are in Servorahmen bearing mounts, with conventional clevises and 2mm stainless threaded rod. I have modded some carbon blistered servo covers to use the blisters as shrouds over the clevis exits on the wings, making it very quiet even at really high speed.
Doc, you are too kind!
I'm very happy to change the pic, and credit, Konrad.@Doc J nice manual. I'd like to ask that in the next revision that my name be removed. The information (photos) are fine I just don't want my name associated with Aeroic, especially since I wasn't paid, or even asked about their use.
All the best,
No, don't change the photo and give me credit for the changed photo. I'm fine with leaving the photo, as I think the information in the photo is fine and helpful to anybody trying to add a ballast tube to their model. We both want the Aeroic customer to get the most from their purchase.I'm very happy to change the pic, and credit, Konrad.
I don't want the Aeroic name associated with you either.
Doc.
For my flying needs, the Forza is better than a Corsa (much lighter wing loading). The reason I'm even on this particular thread (Typhoon MkII) is because I would like a 2M wing that is a durable, portable, fast all arounder that can work light wind conditions and is easy to land in tight spaces between trees and hang gliders.As the price is about $10 different you might want to think about having a Corsa rather than the Forza. I have a Schwing Corsa 2.7 meter (108") and after a bit of redesign, I have to admit it is my favorite sport ship.
I like that the wing tips are a bit further apart, making the ship a bit more efficient. The only down side of the Corsa, design wise is that it has a bit smaller wing area. This with the wider span means the Corsa has a higher aspect ratio wing. This results in a glider that will turn harder and not loose as much speed doing so. This will be the bee's knees in all but the lightest lift. As you have the Magnum for the lighter lift days (not that the Magnum is a light air ship) I think having the wider performance spread will actually result in you having more fun between both ships.
The modern Corsa is a step up from the one I have as it is much easier to place both HS08a servos in the tail. Give the Corsa some thought before returning it. I think this is actually a blessing in disguise.
You must have a better set of eyes than me if the 0.25 m difference would have any effect on threading the needle in the landing zone.It is a matter of the right glider for the flying conditions. I generally fly foamies but the performance is limited, especially on days that may become "blown out" for paragliding or hang gliding. The Magnus is going to be a good fit, but some days might warrant a wing that can carve up more of the sky, yet still get back and land in a tight area when we get a 30 minute lull with almost zero wind. It is no fun watching your glider sink down the face of a steep rocky slope until a tip catches a rock and spins it in. Ability to work light lift is mandatory.
Rocky Mountain Soaring Association (RMSA), Stiff competition for F5J. 2023 Nats F5J places 1, 2 ,3, 5, 9, 13 out of a field of 45 competitors.The Magnificent Mountain Men?
I think the Forza does those things well so for you its probebly a great choice. With the smaller wingspan Its slightly more manoeverable than the Corsa, but its stll a pussycat to land. I put the nose into the slope, flaps down and use the flaps and ailerons to 'helicopter' the model in. It likes it!For my flying needs, the Forza is better than a Corsa (much lighter wing loading). The reason I'm even on this particular thread (Typhoon MkII) is because I would like a 2M wing that is a durable, portable, fast all arounder that can work light wind conditions and is easy to land in tight spaces between trees and hang gliders.
The Forza actually has a really good speed range. Its no Gentle Lady but it will still flying light conditons, but if it blows it can really move.It is a matter of the right glider for the flying conditions. For sloping, I generally fly foamies but the performance is limited, especially on days that may become "blown out" for paragliding or hang gliding. The Magnus is going to be a good fit, but some days might warrant a wing that can carve up more of the sky, yet still get back and land in a tight area when we get a 30 minute lull with almost zero wind.
Will do JJ.It is no fun watching your glider sink down the face of a steep rocky slope until a tip catches a rock and spins it in. Ability to work light lift is mandatory.
I'm sure the Typhoon MkII will fly great, but the Forza is available now and hopefully the extra wingspan won't clip a tree (or HG) on landing. I'm also relying on the good sized flaps to be able to slow it down a lot. The Forza is a better match for my particular flying sites than a Corsa.
I agree with Doc regarding flying vs building. If I win the lottery I'd have Lenny building all my RC gliders.
But we are way off topic. Please just keep us posted on the Typhoon MkII.
I recall that 20 or 25 years ago when I flew a few F3J events it was a 2 man tow event. F3B was the event with the killer winches. I just came back from flying in Evergreen Colo.(8K ft) and can report that the air down here at sea level is like flying in syrup. I almost never overshoot the landing zone. At altitude the ship usually just whiz by as there is no air to slow down the glider.Twenty years ago I used to use crow on my then 64 ounce light F3J glider. Those wings needed to be heavy back then to handle winch launches.
For F5J I don't use crow as it simply isn't needed with those ginormous flaps and 5oz per square foot wing loading, but I do set up crow for slope planes, especially at the high density altitudes that I typically fly at. And when the winds are right, this is how I fly, at one of the sites I fly slope gliders at. Notice the friendly landing terrain full of scrub oak. Best viewed in HD mode.
Yep, my club has many national champion and world class F3F pilots. It is a very humbling and exciting experiance to fly with these guys. It is my job to make these guys look good by filling out the lower standings at the contestsRocky Mountain Soaring Association (RMSA), Stiff competition for F5J. 2023 Nats F5J places 1, 2 ,3, 5, 9, 13 out of a field of 45 competitors.
Club focus is TD: F5J, F3K, F3RES. But some of us fly slope, and other aircraft as well. Great pilots and resources to learn from and continue to improve.