I asked Wayne at Aloft if Frsky made a xjt diy replacement for the dht diy module to make use of the xjt features. Including the L long range series of receivers.
He replied back no, but he’s had requests.
Thanks to Wayne supplying me with a xjt module to modify, I now have a working “XHT†diy solder in module to use for my old tx conversions.
I’m now able to use D8 or D16 mode receivers via the older tx ppm input protocol.
I also have SPort support for sensors and can use the dashboard. That test is next when I receive one.
I’m posting a picture of a total reconfiguration of the XJT into a“XHT†setup to mimic the DHT configuration, including the bind- range test button /leds/mode dip switches on a dongle for remote location mounting.
Consulting with Wayne, he asked if the module could remain more Stock with only the bind/range test button on a remote 2 wire cable. The dip sw and LEDs staying where they are to make the conversion easier. The answer is YES!
If however one would want to externally change the mode from D8 to D16, that too only requires 2 wires and a on off switch, or 3 wires for both.
To remote the entire sw/led/button board requires 4 wires.
To power and input ppm, 3 wires are needed like the dht.
All easy to do.
The only difficult addition is adding a longer coax/antenna connector cable to allow more internal case location mounting in the older tx conversion.
I’ll be posting my so far hand drawings soon of the locations for adding a remote bind button and dip switch.
Or a complete removal and remoted sw/led/button board as well as the longer added antenna coax & connector cable.
Feel free to comment or add to my work. Hopes are that Frsky will make their own “XHT†and save us the trouble after seeing it’s being done.
Also, the data and Sbus pins can be left straight up or bent over.
The swr was verified before and after the antenna coax modification and was in the normal 16 to 1 range ( it does seem to wander before and after).
All bench tests compare with a unmodified xjt in a x9d+ as well as verifying the ppm only input supports D8 and D 16.
I haven’t done a old tx conversion and flight test yet but will in the coming week as time permits.
I hope this is of enough interest to have others on board with suggestions and beta testing.
Glen
He replied back no, but he’s had requests.
Thanks to Wayne supplying me with a xjt module to modify, I now have a working “XHT†diy solder in module to use for my old tx conversions.
I’m now able to use D8 or D16 mode receivers via the older tx ppm input protocol.
I also have SPort support for sensors and can use the dashboard. That test is next when I receive one.
I’m posting a picture of a total reconfiguration of the XJT into a“XHT†setup to mimic the DHT configuration, including the bind- range test button /leds/mode dip switches on a dongle for remote location mounting.
Consulting with Wayne, he asked if the module could remain more Stock with only the bind/range test button on a remote 2 wire cable. The dip sw and LEDs staying where they are to make the conversion easier. The answer is YES!
If however one would want to externally change the mode from D8 to D16, that too only requires 2 wires and a on off switch, or 3 wires for both.
To remote the entire sw/led/button board requires 4 wires.
To power and input ppm, 3 wires are needed like the dht.
All easy to do.
The only difficult addition is adding a longer coax/antenna connector cable to allow more internal case location mounting in the older tx conversion.
I’ll be posting my so far hand drawings soon of the locations for adding a remote bind button and dip switch.
Or a complete removal and remoted sw/led/button board as well as the longer added antenna coax & connector cable.
Feel free to comment or add to my work. Hopes are that Frsky will make their own “XHT†and save us the trouble after seeing it’s being done.
Also, the data and Sbus pins can be left straight up or bent over.
The swr was verified before and after the antenna coax modification and was in the normal 16 to 1 range ( it does seem to wander before and after).
All bench tests compare with a unmodified xjt in a x9d+ as well as verifying the ppm only input supports D8 and D 16.
I haven’t done a old tx conversion and flight test yet but will in the coming week as time permits.
I hope this is of enough interest to have others on board with suggestions and beta testing.
Glen
Last edited: