A good days flying today. Snapflap works very nicely as does snap reflex. Also a slight change in the CoG has made it much more neutral, although I think I need to go just a tad further, with not so much down ele required when inverted, the rolls are better now too and the square loops squarer etc.. Slowly pushing the envelope, managed a loop which was 325' from bottom to top (that's after the dive), but I reckon there's plenty more to go there, I just don't want to break it too soon.

, although she didn't seem fussed in the slightest. She even seemed happy enough with an inverted square loop (not too square, slightly rounded corners, let's not be too silly yet). Stall turns were nice and high - always pleasing. I'm enjoying this model and am ashamed to say I didn't even fly my previous 'go to' model. I do wonder how far I can push the standard version though. I do have an rx with a G meter (not currently installed in this model) so I could check what G I'm pulling, but then I don't know where the limit is (currently unballasted).
But here's a question for Doc. Why are the servo wells where they are? I reckon if they went 5mm towards the l/e it would give just a bit more room for 10mm servos and make the install easier (for the aileron anyway). The only down side I can think of is the control rod would be slightly longer, but given how short they are I can't see that would be a major problem. Or does the linkage then start to interfere with the surfaces too much?
I think I'd also like to see cheap and cheerful bubble wrap 'wing bags' etc. included, there appeared to be a little what I can only assume was transit damage on the model when I collected it (and another I saw). Not noticeable on the slope, but a bit annoying when I've spent that sort of money. Although it won't be long before I get worse damage on the underside from landings etc..